Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
- From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
- To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Proofreading adjustments for first two parts of documentation
- Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:54:12 -0700
- Message-id: <20090427185412.GP1539@fetter.org> <text/plain>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 09:50:13PM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On Monday 27 April 2009 20:10:27 David Fetter wrote:
> > While we're at it, can we see about moving foreign keys out of the
> > "advanced" section? They've been standard for many years. Heck,
> > even MySQL has had them, at least in some of their engines, for
> > many years.
>
> Advanced doesn't have to mean nonstandard, and standard doesn't have
> to mean basic.
Are you seriously arguing that foreign keys aren't basic? Seriously?
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index