Re: rules regression test failed on mingw

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: rules regression test failed on mingw
Date: 2008-12-15 16:01:48
Message-ID: 20081215160148.GF4067@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jaime Casanova wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

> > It was sane behavior a couple of decades ago -- dictionaries used to
> > sort like this ("ch" was considered an independent letter, and sorted
> > between c and d).
>
> while 'ch' and 'll' are independent letters they sort as they were 'c'
> and 'l'... that means that 'ch' should go before 'ck'
>
> http://www.rae.es/rae/gestores/gespub000018.nsf/(voAnexos)/arch8100821B76809110C12571B80038BA4A/$File/CuestionesparaelFAQdeconsultas.htm#ap31

Interesting. So they are both wrong, glibc and teachers. We can file a
bug with glibc but I'm not sure we can do a lot about the other "bug".
Thanks for the research.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-12-15 16:17:37 Re: rules regression test failed on mingw
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-12-15 15:55:50 Re: visibility map and reltuples