Re: difference between 'where' and 'having'
- From: Emil Obermayr <nobs(at)nobswolf(dot)info>
- To: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: difference between 'where' and 'having'
- Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:41:08 +0200
- Message-id: <200804282241.09116.nobs@nobswolf.info> <text/plain>
Am Montag, 28. April 2008 schrieb Adam Šindelář:
> ... what difference there is between a WHERE clause and a
> HAVING clause besides the syntax?
That's a classic :)
"where" is a selection directly on the data in the database
"having" is a selection on the result
in simple selects, the database-data and the result-data basically is the same
but there are quite simple things you can't do with a "where" like selecting
on the number of records aggregated by a "group by":
select city, count(*) from customers group by city having count(*) > 10;
to see in which cities you have more than 10 customers.
Some databases allow all selections allowed in where also in having. Mostly
this is stupid because it costs performance. having-selections are not
optimized during the database-scan. You should use them only on aggregated
results.
Hope this helps a bit
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index