Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Peripheral Links

Header And Logo

PostgreSQL
| The world's most advanced open source database.

Site Navigation

Search archives
  Advanced Search

Re: We should get active / Wiki choice

  • From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
  • To: Koen Martens <gmc(at)sonologic(dot)nl>
  • Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgresqlfr(dot)org>, Susanne Ebrecht <miracee(at)miracee(dot)de>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, damien(at)dalibo(dot)info, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
  • Subject: Re: We should get active / Wiki choice
  • Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:59:57 +0100
  • Message-id: <20080226115957.GO528@svr2.hagander.net> <text/plain>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:46:08PM +0100, Koen Martens wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 12:36:31PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:31:50AM +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> > > That and it runs on Postgres which I think is an important
> > > consideration. Yuck, dog food :-p
> > 
> > That's a requirement, I thought ;-) at least TWiki does, though there was
> > some chatter lately about them not being so interested in it?
> 
> TWiki does not use a database backend. About the PostgreSQL thing,

Really? How does it actually store things then, and deal with concurrency
etc?

> the remark was made by someone from twiki.net, a commercial entity that
> only recently started business, and in no way reflects what the open
> source community thinks about this.

Ah, now that you mention it, I remember that's what it was. So that
argument is moot then.

//Magnus
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996 – 2012 PostgreSQL Global Development Group