From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | The definition of PGDG |
Date: | 2007-11-08 15:38:29 |
Message-ID: | 1577300971a22a6b93645e8256220378@biglumber.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
Simon Riggs wrote:
> The main reason is that Slony is Copyrighted PGDG, so we
> own the code and it is of course BSD licenced.
As an aside, how can copyright be assigned to a non-defined
group (a concept really, as near as I can tell). Is the PGDG
actually defined anywhere yet? If not, anyone want to take
a stab at it?
IMHO, we need to get this resolved at some point - either have
the code owned by their respective contributors (e.g. Linux)
or by a legal entity (e.g. Apache Foundation). The former may
be what we actually have anyway.
Copying to advocacy as someone there may have the answer.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200711081016
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iD8DBQFHMyqrvJuQZxSWSsgRAw0hAJ9DD2gwr4nlmeoPNPeifXTloWip6ACgwv9z
WQTV1ccmRQ0EBbomxQUxeak=
=zng7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frederick Zarndt | 2007-11-08 15:55:24 | Postgresql downloads |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-08 15:28:34 | Re: Mentioning Slony in docs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-11-08 16:42:12 | Re: The definition of PGDG |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-11-08 15:28:34 | Re: Mentioning Slony in docs |