| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: delta relations in AFTER triggers |
| Date: | 2014-06-19 15:57:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1403193438.59354.YahooMailNeo@web122304.mail.ne1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've already said that I now think we should use the standard
> CREATE TRIGGER syntax to specify the transition tables, and that
> if we do that we don't need the reloption that's in the patch.
> If you ignore the 19 lines of new code to add that reloption,
> absolutely 100% of the code changes in the patch so far are in
> trigger.c and trigger.h.
Although nobody has actually framed their feedback as a review, I
feel that I have enough to work with to throw the patch into
Waiting on Author status. Since I started with the assumption that
I was going to be using standard syntax and got a ways into that
before convincing myself it was a bad idea, I should have a new
version of the patch working that way in a couple days.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Abhijit Menon-Sen | 2014-06-19 16:03:50 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |
| Previous Message | Vik Fearing | 2014-06-19 15:53:17 | Re: idle_in_transaction_timeout |