From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes) |
Date: | 2013-06-26 19:07:26 |
Message-ID: | 1372273646.22498.3.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, 2013-06-24 at 20:34 -0400, Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> This patch is in the current CommitFest, does it still need to be
> reviewed? If so, I notice that the version in pgfoundry's CVS is
> rather different than the version the patch seems to have been built
> against (presumably the pg_filedump-9.2.0.tar.gz release), and
> conflicts in several places with cvs tip.
Rebased against CVS tip; attached.
> Also, would anyone be willing to convert this repository to git and
> post it on github or similar? pgfoundry is becoming increasingly
> difficult to use, for instance the 'Browse CVS Repository' link for
> pg_filedump and other projects is broken[1] and apparently has been
> for months[2], not to mention the general crumminess of using CVS [3].
Eventually, it would be nice to have a more full-featured offline
checker utility. Do we want to try to turn this utility into that, or
make a new one?
Regards,
Jeff Davis
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
filedump-9.3.checksums.diff | text/x-patch | 5.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fabien COELHO | 2013-06-26 19:08:50 | Re: Add more regression tests for dbcommands |
Previous Message | Szymon Guz | 2013-06-26 19:05:10 | Re: Add more regression tests for CREATE OPERATOR |