| From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Ants Aasma <ants(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Date: | 2013-03-03 14:33:08 |
| Message-ID: | 1362321188.12641.YahooMailNeo@web162905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW name [, ...] WITH [ NO ] DATA
Given the short time, I left out the "[, ...]". If people think
that is important to get into this release, a follow-on patch might
be possible.
> Barring objections, I will use the above and push tomorrow.
I'm still working on docs, and the changes related to the syntax
change are still only lightly tested, but as far as I know, all is
complete except for the docs. I'm still working on those and
expect to have them completed late today. I'm posting this patch
to allow a chance for final review of the code changes before I
push.
--
Kevin Grittner
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| matview-v5.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 56.3 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2013-03-03 17:06:36 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-03-03 13:59:00 | pgsql: doc: Small tweak for consistency |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-03-03 14:37:59 | Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-03-03 14:28:55 | Re: in-catalog Extension Scripts and Control parameters (templates?) |