From: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: opportunistic tuple freezing |
Date: | 2009-09-17 17:09:27 |
Message-ID: | 1253207367.22589.22.camel@jdavis |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 12:36 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> Despite my recent screw-up in this department, it should really be the
> patch author's responsibility to test the patch first. Then the
> reviewing process can involve additional testing. So I would say this
> should be moved to Returned With Feedback, and then it can be
> resubmitted later with test results.
Fine with me. I already suspected that this patch wouldn't make it to
the September commitfest:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-09/msg00798.php
Regards,
Jeff Davis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-09-17 17:11:42 | Re: community decision-making & 8.5 |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-09-17 17:02:35 | Re: Feedback on getting rid of VACUUM FULL |