Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 00:15:59 -0400
- Message-id: <12468.1182744959@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
aaime74 <andrea(dot)aime(at)gmail(dot)com> writes: > Hum, interesting. What would be the boatload of disadvantages? Portability and cross-machine compatibility, or lack of same. It's tough enough trying to make things work for relatively primitive datatypes like float. I can hardly imagine that anyone would want to support binary representations across platforms for geometric types. regards, tom lane
- References:
- Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: aaime74
- Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- From: aaime74
- Status of binary protocol usage?
- Prev by Date: Patch to improve Cloneable implementation on classes which extend PGobject.
- Next by Date: Prepared statements, parameters and logging
- Previous by thread: Re: Status of binary protocol usage?
- Next by thread: Patch to improve Cloneable implementation on classes which extend PGobject.
- Indexes: