Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>
To: "'Amit kapila'" <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: "'Alvaro Herrera'" <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation
Date: 2013-01-28 13:39:22
Message-ID: 00b001cdfd5c$e286dc40$a79494c0$@kapila@huawei.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Monday, January 21, 2013 9:32 PM Amit kapila wrote:
On 11 January 2013 15:57, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>>>>> I've moved this to the next CF. I'm planning to review this one first.
>>
>>>> Thank you.
>
>>> Just reviewing the patch now, making more sense with comments added.

>> Making more sense, but not yet making complete sense.

>> I'd like you to revisit the patch comments since some of them are
completely unreadable.
 
>I have modified most of the comments in code.
>The changes in attached patch are as below:
 

Rebased the patch as per HEAD.
 
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
wal_update_changes_v9.patch application/octet-stream 61.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-01-28 13:39:24 Re: Patches for TODO item: Avoid truncating empty OCDR temp tables on COMMIT
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2013-01-28 13:11:12 Re: autovacuum not prioritising for-wraparound tables